Writing Formats, Character, The Simpsons Movie
Monday, January 7th, 2008
This past Christmas, my in-laws gave me The Simpsons Movie on DVD, and then, we all watched it together. Afterwards, I watched it about three more times, and here are my thoughts in a nutshell. By any stretch, this is not a complete review.
The movie, as it’s written, is interesting because it’s structurally different than what fans are used to. The standard Simpsons episode is usually, without commercials, about 15 minutes or so. There’s usually the set up, which in many cases, has nothing to do with the rest of the episode, and then the rest follows up on it. There isn’t really any time for character complexity on a grander scale.
The movie, on the other hand, allows for multiple story lines at the same time. So, we, as viewers, get to see Bart struggle with his relationship with his father, Marge struggle with her marriage, and Lisa fall in love with somebody other than Millhouse. While this is all well and fine, juggling the sub-plots leaves the movie a little humorless and dragging at points. Or, at least, it seems that way.
Some fans I know, like my wife, for example, complained that there wasn’t enough of the other characters, like Patty and Selma or Comic Book Guy. In that regard, it’s a given – if the writers tried to cram in every Springflielder, then the story arcs would have gotten a little bogged down. And also: every episode, every week, doesn’t cram in every minor character, so why should the movie? In a way, the challenge, for the writers, most have been the colossal expectations fans had. After all, there’s been more than a decade of shows in TV episode format. This certainly was an issue with Futurama: Bender’s Big Score, where the writers knew that eventually, the movie was going to be broken down into episode long segments, so it could air on TV. Still, I kind of liked how the movie tried to get a little deeper into the characters, because that gave Bart, Homer, Marge, and Lisa a little more emotional substance than what viewers are used to on TV. At any rate, it’s sad to know that there’s no ready plans for a sequel anytime soon.

It’s a fact. Not only does The Simpsons universe contain a long running television series and a successful movie, but there’s a publishing empire that goes with it. Most of this comes in the form of
Not that many heads of state have actively chosen to appear on comedy shows. Sure, there’s President Nixon and “Laugh-In” (A precursor to Saturday Night Live that featured a young Goldie Hawn). King Abdullah of Jordan, who was educated in England, is an ardent Star Trek fan, and he once made a cameo appearance on a Trek show, while visiting America. Then, of course, there’s Tony Blair, who lent his voice to an England themed Simpsons episode. His successor, 
By using Google’s “blog search”, I thought it might be interesting to take a random sampling. So, around the Internet, here are some reactions to the brand new DVD:
This just has me scratching my head, wondering what I have missed. I have to admit total ignorance. Yet, on Page 6 of the New York Post, the gossip is that George Takei (Sulu of the original Star Trek) did voice over work for The Simpsons. Takei, the article alleges, creeped out the rest of the Simpsons talent, and as such, won’t be asked back. I’m scratching my head, because unlike Phil Hartman or Kelsey Grammar, I honestly can’t remember Takei being a semi regular guest, or even a guest, period. More than anything, I remember that he’s had some feuds in the past with William Shatner, but that’s Star Trek nonsense, with a cast that was notorious for its squabbling. At any rate,
The Simpsons has the distinction of
The similarities between the shows are undeniable. Both The Simpsons and The Flintstones are sitcoms, and both are focused around aspects of “family.” There’s a universe at work too. Homer drives around Springfield, and Fred Flinstone drives around Bedrock. But the man fundamental difference come from the main characters. Fred Flintstone and Homer Simpson are fundamentally different people.
rougher. Homer is more stupid, but Fred is more pigheaded. In short, there’s more pride, more stubborn swagger with Mr. Flintstone. After all, one could easily suggest that he’s patterned off of Ralph Kramden, of the Honeymooners. Homer is just an institution unto himself, independent of television precedent
Spock, on Star Trek, once remarked that, “In an insane world, is a sane man truly sane?” Sanity, intelligence, moral authority — sometimes these are relative terms, defined by the society around them. In a way, it’s also close to something Tom Waits said in his song “Singapore,” where “In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.” Whenever I think of Lisa Simpson, I think of those two sayings. Lisa really does occupy a unique place within the Springfield universe. To an extent,