Vanity Fair History of The Simpsons
Monday, July 16th, 2007The essay is long, but the quality is good and informative. Vanity Fair has published a detailed history of The Simpsons. In a sense, it would be too long to pick out and block quote all the good bits, but here’s a choice few morsels from the article:
“It’s like what sci-fi fans say about Star Trek: it created an audience for that genre,” says Seth MacFarlane, the creator of Family Guy. “I think The Simpsons created an audience for prime-time animation that had not been there for many, many years. As far as I’m concerned, they basically re-invented the wheel. They created what is in many ways—you could classify it as—a wholly new medium. It’s just wholly original.”
“The Simpsons is the bane of our existence,” says Matt Stone, co-creator of South Park with Trey Parker. “They have done so many parodies, tackled so many subjects. ‘Simpsons did it!’ is a very familiar refrain in our writers’ room. Trey and I are constantly having our little cartoon compared to the best show in the history of television, The Simpsons. Why can’t we be compared to According to Jim? Or Sister, Sister?”
Not that there aren’t some debits on The Simpsons’ ledger—for every King of the Hill, there was a Fish Police and a Critic. But over 18 years, The Simpsons has been so influential, it is difficult to find any strain of television comedy that does not contain its DNA. And yet the show’s footprint is so much larger. Homer’s signature “D’oh!” has been added to the Oxford English Dictionary.
What’s interesting, really, is the expansive nature. They start at the beginning, really, back when the current presidents father, while running for reelection, tried to slam the decline in “values” that The Simpsons “represented.” Vanity Fair also delves into Matt Groening’s career, and some of the other cultural implications the show has had on its 18 season, and counting.
The votes have been tallied, and Springfield, Vermont has won the right to host the premiere of the Simpson’s movie. The contest, hosted by
Many television shows, actors and directors will attest, are destroyed by the meddling of studio execs. Often, this comes by way of meddlesome “notes” that carry the weight — in terms of network authority — akin to an executive order or a regal fiat. It goes without saying that this cramps the creative process, to a large extent. In this regard, consider the following comment by Harry Shearer, as reported by
What is happening to traditional, hand drawn animation? If one looks at box office receipts lately, the multiplex really has been dominated by Pixar Studios and their imitators. It seems that computers has taken over, becoming the dominant method of animation. Lets think about it this way. How many CGI films came out recently? Ratatouille, Surfs Up, Shrek the Third, and so on and so on. How many hand crafted cartoons? None that I can think of this year, and looking back through recent history, the only thing that comes to mind, besides the forthcoming Simpsons Movie, was the cinematic version of Spongebob Squarepants.
Of the many Simpsons promotional campaigns to come, one of the more interesting comes from 7-11, who decided to remodel 11 or so of it’s stores and rename them “Kwick-E Mart.” Sure, each store cannot feature an Apu, but the products sold are all unique to Springfield, whether it’s Buzz Cola, Duff Beer, or Blue Berry Squishees, according to 